SHEHAR YAR ALIAS SHAHRI versus STATE
Section 2302 / Ju 34 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000I 2000), the section T trial court granted the defendant's request for a separate trial under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, Val 2000 Val's Validation School leaving certificate. As well as the Medical Board's Ossification Report. The radiologist showed the suspect under the age of 18 on the day of the incident, the trial court relied primarily on the berth certificate presented by the complainant stating that the defendant was 18 years of age on the day of the incident. The birth certificate has a more definite value than the opinion of the expert. The best test for age determination was the radiologist's reasoning and the report; the same case was based on the result of highly technical and advanced equipment and accordingly the aborted order was separated. And being directed to prosecute a juvenile separately under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 I had
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Saidu Sharif lawyer
