KHADIM HUSSAIN versus THE SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND WORKS, LAHORE
Section 1 (4) (e), 10 and Section O1 (e) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Temporary Irrigation and Work Charges Regulation Rules, Section 1, R1 131 of the Irrigation Department Employed Charge Employees Establishment. Continuing to serve employees for more than eight years, and paying salaries on a work charge, dismissing the Labor Court's employees' complaint on the basis that, regardless of length of service, they are required to pay permanent or Cannot be declared a regular employee. There was nothing in Chapter 1 of 131 records establishing Irrigation Temporary and Work Charge Regularization Rules to show that the appointment of such employees is against a particular project, and whether such Employees who were present or standing on the project, were earlier challenged to be dismissed and were ordered to be reinstated by the Labor Court, which was accepted by the Labor Appeal. The Tribunal High Court accepted the appeals and set aside the unclean decision by the agency's history of complaints requests to make such employees permanent workers.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Makli lawyer