Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, COLONIES, LAHORE

Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The abolition of the Constitutional Request Strengthening Scheme, the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960's Power of Board of Revenue Extension Consolidation Scheme was subsequently rejected by the Consolidation Officer. In the same review petition filed by the petitioners against the orders of the Additional Commissioner, the Additional Commissioner, who was found illegal and irregular, was not allowed by the Board of Revenue by the applicants after the scheme was finalized. The parties were left to pursue legal proceedings. The law and the measures provided by the scheme were prepared by the Board of Revenue Validation Scheme by the Consolidation Officer under section 10 of the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960, when it was confirmed that the victim's Was open to challenge from the side. According to the Appeal under Section 11, Section 13 of the Ordinance provided that the Ordinance Board of Revenue had the authority to summon a record of any proceedings under the Ordinance, whether the matter was pending or the stability officer and Was dealt with by the former. When irregularities and irregularities are exposed in this regard, the Board of Revenue will monitor whether the act of stabilization was done in accordance with the law without affecting the rights. Appealing to an organizational structure by some agitators about landlords will not deny the Board of Revenue its powers under Article 13 of the Ordinance, since it was at the height of this classification and monitored under it. Duty was imposed. Of the ordinance criminal advocate from Nowshero Feroz lawyer