Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus STATE

Section 2 (2 (b) / & 34 & 4 324/3434) The accused accused of complimenting the evidence prepared himself with daggers and came to the complainant's house and sent two real brothers, aged 18 and 20 years. The mother and sister were injured and all the witnesses were injured and there was no natural disagreement between the parties regarding the horrific incident that took place as a prisoner of the house. In order to suggest the possibility of false affiliation during the incident or during the outbreak. The mention was naturally trivial, which was naturally possible in the course of their attacks and invasions, and they demanded the recovery of blood-stained daggers. The testimony of the natural eye witnesses was unfounded, The two accused, at the age of 30, had sensation and understanding, not called in their father's command, the third accused had no basis for the lower sentence of Pulia. The punishment or punishment and the seven accused were retained in the circumstances. ask a advocate free from Panjan Kisan lawyer