Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VEHARI

Section 12 Government Land (Punjab) Act (V12 of 1912), Sections 19 and 30 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 The acquisition of the proprietary rights of the specific performance of the contract in the suit was in the interest of the employees of Islamabad. The lenders, through a written agreement, agreed to sell the property in a dispute allocated to it, for which the allottee / vendor received a certain amount of money while balancing the sale of the sale deed which provided for the ownership rights. Was to be implemented. Respecting Suit Land on Allotment / Seller On the Provision of Proprietary Rights on the Legal Heritage of the Slaughter-Allies; He stated that the legal heirs / defendants sold tenancy rights to the plaintiff's property rather than the applicant's behalf The agreement was implemented by the predecessor in the interest of the defendant as the sale process was to be executed in favor of the applicant on the grant of proprietary rights. On the original allotment in relation to the suit land, before any of the claimed property rights granted by the applicant, he was mature and could not process the proprietary rights in respect of the suit land, referred to the defendant on 6 April 1989. Was a good opportunity within the time of Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908, filed by the applicant on 7-7 1991, which provided a 3-year limit for filing such litigation. The following two court orders were set aside and a lawsuit was filed by the applicant. Order with costs solicitors from Chicha watni lawyer