Find a Lawyer

FAQEER BAKHSH versus KHAN MUHAMMAD

Comparison of the thumb impression of the question of the defendant with the impression of the thumb by the handwriting expert by the order of the Arts 59, 60 and 133 is not the same as the opinion of both the thumbs in the opinion of such expert, who in the court The report was filed, in which its statement was recorded. It was carefully examined by the plaintiff's request that the fingerprint expert be allowed to present it to another expert in the denial of such expert evidence presented by the defendant because of his opinion. The plaintiff will not be bound in court. The name of another expert failed to obtain anything from the plaintiff in cross-examination with such expert, therefore, it was not necessary to present the report and evidence to reject the expert's evidence presented in court. Allow another expert to do the work. \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• MUHAMMAD JAVED IQBAL v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS/DISTRICT JUDGE-I, LAHORE 2013 CLC 944
• ISLAM DIN v. MUHAMMAD YOUNAS 2013 YLR 947
• Hafiz RIAZ AHMAD v. KHURSHED AHMAD 2013 MLD 947
• Rana MUHAMMAD AHSAN RASOOL v. State 2013 PCrLJ 953
• ABDUL JABBAR v. State 2013 YLR 958
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. Mian MUHAMMAD SALEEM 2013 CLC 960
• SHAHBAZ KHAN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, FEROZEWALA 2013 MLD 962
• NADEEM RAZA v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2013 YLR 965

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

how to become a advocate from Mithi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes