Section 17A Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Reinstatement of constitutional application against restitution of interim order, provision of recovery suit, order of recovery of restitution allowance has been granted by the husband family court order under which it has to proceed. During the interim maintenance orders have been ordered. On the basis that the proportion of care was overstated, the husband claimed that he had recently been fired, disputed questions about the facts about the job, the source of income, and the husband's salary were raised in the Constitution. Cannot resolve jurisdiction. It was not possible for the High Court and the truth of the husband's claims to be recorded without evidence. Such an action could not be taken under the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction, especially when its detection was by nature only temporary. Interim in the final and inviolable order was Article 3 of Article 199 of the Constitution, the petition against the interim order was admissible if it was void, without jurisdiction, or the status of a final injunction, the Family Court Interim Restitution Allowance. Had the jurisdiction to decide, therefore, the defamation order did not fall within this type of legislation in the West Pakistan. Under section 14 (3) of the Dental Courts, 1964 had specifically prohibited the filing of an appeal against the interim order and if a constitutional petition was allowed to be filed against such order, It would also be like defeating and turning over the intention of the legislature, which had an alternate alternative, challenging the unspecified order in the appeal. If it can be filed against the final order / decision then if approved by the husband
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
