Find a Lawyer

QAYUM versus STATE

Section 9 (b) delay of sending samples to evidence laboratory, delay of six days, sample testing and preparation of report was delayed 22 days and receipt of report of forensic science laboratory was delayed by 15 days, but as such The delay was not explained by Syed, who delayed the trial of the suspects to such an extent that the prosecution did not prove that the prohibited charisma samples remained safe for six days in the police station and 22 days in the laboratory. Policemen used to report. There were good witnesses like the others, but the circumstances of the case showed that the police considered the accused a former criminal and a dealer in the illegal business and took Rs 10,000 from him at the time of the alleged recovery of the prohibited charase. The recovery, without any registration, was not proved by the evidence of four private individuals who were expected to appear before the accused against the accused. en Suspect proved beyond doubt, giving the accused the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted of the charge against him. top advocates from Sihala lawyer