MUHAMMAD AZRAM versus STATE
Definition of Section 2 (2 (b)) of the evidence was filed immediately to the FIR was the only witness, although the eyewitnesses were closely related to the deceased, in which case the false interference of the accused had no enmity or purpose. The accused was known to the complaining party, but the widow was the most natural witness to the incident. The witness also proved his presence at the scene and supported his statement. It was proved that the bullet recovered from the victim's body was fired with a pistol, which was irreparable and believable from the account of the accused eye witness, sentenced to imprisonment for lack of purpose or lack of absence. Death and Punishment Will Not Create Opportunities to Reduce Death Penalty
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer
