Find a Lawyer

RAHAM HUSSAIN versus ABDUL REHMAN

O VII, R 10, O XXIII, R 1 & O XLVII, Rr 1, 2 & 4 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 8 and 42 Returning the Application Form Review the application for permission to exclude the application. The application for the property, the declaration filed by the plaintiff and the Mason's profit litigation was returned to the plaintiff because it was returned to the plaintiff under the auspices of legal jurisdiction, contrary to the order of return of the plaintiff. Plaintiff awaited the application filed under OXXII, R1, CPC. Withdraw the case, but the Additional District Judge said that the applicants subsequently filed a petition for review, but said that the petitioner's Additional District Judge also dismissed the application on a technical basis. That he was not legally eligible to review the order passed in his predecessor and that he was also unable to sit on his order as an appellate authority, the Validation Judge, who would later take office. Was charged with being a successor to. A. XLVII, a specialist under the terms of CPCKR2, enjoyed full authority and had jurisdiction to decide the review request and to apply the jurisdiction and review the decision. An injunction was granted, the impeachment order was set aside and the matter was remanded by the High Court. Using your amending power, the Additional District Judge shall, within the prescribed time, decide the request for review after hearing by the parties in accordance with the law. divorce advocates from Jauharabad lawyer