LIAQUAT ALI BHURGRI versus NAVEED
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 34 bail, in the present case the cancellation of the application for the trial court did not adopt the procedure required for release on bail. It clearly indicated that the trial court did not comply. Apply your mind or give a reason for the bail, it seems that the order of bail was passed mechanically without considering the provisions of section 497, CR PC, as the offense against the accused is prohibited by section 497. Under the clause, the CCP could not grant bail. In the meaning of section 497, to be declared as a legal order, the CCP was not being protected from any provision of the law, it was ordered to grant bail and the matter was remanded to the trial court. To decide the bail of the accused. As per section 497, the application of PCPPP was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Lawrence pur lawyer