NIMAZ DIN versus STATE
The guarantee of evidence on record, before the arrest of Section 498 Criminal Procedure (X LV of 1860), Sections 302, 337 H (ii), 147, 148 and 149, has been fully proved that at the time of the alleged incident. Were not present on. He was in the custody of the Levies Police of Balochistan Province as he was taken into custody in an arms case against him by the accused at an early stage. He was not investigated by the investigating officer and his There was no reason to doubt the authenticity of the evidence presented by the accused in this regard. At his request for alibi and there was a possibility that the accused was maliciously involved in the case with a very negative motive, the accused person did not appear in the FIR nor did his character appear in the FIR. I was listed and according to the prosecution's testimony, he was involved in the case. After the delay of 17 days under Section 161, CRPC, there was a dispute between the parties regarding the management of the relevant Dargah and they were involved in legal proceedings against the accused, confirming their bail before the circumstances. A case has been filed for, depending on the nature of the offense, the amount of bail bail, however, accordingly the accused was directed to appear before the trial court and face trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Tall lawyer