COMMISSIONER OF INCOME/WEALTH TAX versus MUHAMMAD ZAKA ASHRAF
The controversial ruling of the Tribunal, which appealed to the Section 27 High Court, has revealed that the Tribunal has refused to exercise its jurisdiction to decide the appeal completely and effectively, which is why the Tribunal did not decide the issue. can do. Routes, hidden as reasons for avoiding judgment on the cases in the appeal, had rejected the High Court's assertion that the High Court had placed the Tribunal's impugned order with the observation that there was no other better than the present for remand. That can't be the case. The filing before the Tribunal will be considered pending, which will be decided by the Tribunal in accordance with the law, the parties will be allowed to deal with their respective submissions so that they can refer the matter to the Tribunal for re-employment. Granted, answers to questions were rejected. High court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Talamba lawyer
