MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction Jurisdiction There was sufficient jurisdiction to consider subsequent events, declaring this matter a matter. In the present case, if the contents of the constitutional petition and the disputes of the parties are placed in another position, this will bring the matter to the fore. Controversial fact questions and the High Court had no jurisdiction to resolve the disputed question in its constitutional jurisdiction, except in the case of multiple alternative remedies including the competent court's constitutional application before filing a complaint against the authority. The analogy was not sustained and was dealt with. Accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
