Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Section 13 Section R No. 555 (I) / 2002 Dated 23 8 2002 Drug Act (XXXI of 1976), Proposed Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 25 Constitutional Appeal The applicant's argument for exemption from sales tax was that adhesive Plaster was removed. With this exception, which was recovered by the applicant, they consisted of pharmaceutical ingredients on adhesive plaster that were made in the form of cream, ointment and gel in accordance with Section RO 555 (I) / 2002 23 2002. The waiver was granted in 2002, and the sole basis for the removal of applicant's products was because the treated drug was used on an adhesive plaster without petitioners in any strip or other cover. Can be used, he claims, being discriminated against like this. Product Differentiation Ion If it is alleged that the applicant's medical properties are similar to other medical products which are exempt under the said section R, then the case under Article 25 of the Constitution is subject to interference of the High Court. Can Applicant's complaint cannot be decided without the determination of the medical properties and ingredients of this product and whether other products related to the same property and ingredients are enjoying immunity as requested by the applicant. For the purpose, in cases where the relevant authorities were first dealt with and determined by the High Court, the Central Board of Revenue will consider the applicant's assertion and determine whether such products contain such ingredients. And properties that were exempt under Section RO. 555 (I) / 2002 when cream, ointment and c law firms from Toru lawyer