MST. ZUBAIDA BEGUM THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES versus SHAH MUHAMMAD
O VI, R 8 The Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the document execution plaintiff sued for specific performance of the contract, separating section 12 suit petitions for specific performance of the contract that it owed and other Has made progress. And the defendant failed to perform the contract, the defendant denied the receipt of a substantial sum, and in advance he claimed that it was the lease amount, as well as the suit, which was rejected. That the plaintiff's son had produced the author's son, a minor witness, and that he himself had appeared as a witness plaintiff, that his signature on the contract proved to be in effect, and the defendant was obliged to reject the evidence presented. Darius was contrary to his pleadings so the evidence taken was not looked at by Paliya but the written statement was missing in the petition. Cannot consider GA. The conclusions relevant to the facts' conclusions conclude that the appeal was dismissed with costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Rashidabad lawyer
