There was no evidence on the record of the definition of section 9 (c) evidence to determine whether the samples were allegedly extracted from the recovered material or when it was sealed and who sealed it. Also, it was unclear when the samples were received. Those who received the same and remained in custody for more than fifteen days, were told that samples were not obtained from each packet of the person with the substance recovered, who sent samples to the chemical laboratory for analysis. Were unaware the samples were sent to the chemical specialist were available on record for the possession of the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
