MST. MARYAM BEGUM versus RIAZ MUHAMMAD
Sections 39 and 42 declare the constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) and the termination of the Ceiling Deed claim that the plaintiffs' allegations of sale by the courts for fraud, misrepresentation and any such The result of being ignored. He was responsible for canceling the evidence, which provided proof that the sale agreement was registered and that the advance profession was properly considered in the interest of the plaintiff, the minor evidence of the sale process was presented to the trial court and The real brother of both parties testified about it. The sale case was dismissed in favor of the plaintiff filed by the plaintiff and the judgment and order passed by the trial court were upheld with the lower appellate court, as well as the High Court verdict. The High Court reviewed the entire evidence and After discussing it, he came to the right conclusion. The concurrent discovery of fact by the courts below was not the result of any misrepresentation or misreading of the plaintiffs' Dennis suit was rightly denied and any decision passed by the High Court under the jurisdiction of the review Was not subjected to illegal interference under which the appeal of the Supreme Court was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Vehari lawyer