Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. MUKHTAR MAI versus ABDUL KHALIQ


Sections 10 (3), 10 (4) and 11 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (c) and 21 (1) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 149/109 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), The interlocutory applications were approved by the Arts 185 () and 203 DD in appeals against the acquittal of the accused by leave of the High Court. Whether the case was brought before a competent terrorism court. Whether the Anti-Terrorism Court can try other offenses than scheduled crimes, which could otherwise be exclusively under the jurisdiction of other courts. Whether the accused's appeals before the High Court were competent or not. And whether the Federal Shariah Court under Article 203 DD of the Constitution can interfere with the High Court's appeal order, it may also remove many other parties' concessions raised on the merits of the case.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Narang Mandi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.