Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MST. MUKHTAR MAI versus ABDUL KHALIQ


Sections 10 (3), 10 (4) and 11 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (c) and 21 (1) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 149/109 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), The interlocutory applications were approved by the Arts 185 () and 203 DD in appeals against the acquittal of the accused by leave of the High Court. Whether the case was brought before a competent terrorism court. Whether the Anti-Terrorism Court can try other offenses than scheduled crimes, which could otherwise be exclusively under the jurisdiction of other courts. Whether the accused's appeals before the High Court were competent or not. And whether the Federal Shariah Court under Article 203 DD of the Constitution can interfere with the High Court's appeal order, it may also remove many other parties' concessions raised on the merits of the case.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Vehari lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.