Find a Lawyer

NOORA versus AHMAD

Section ((iv) (c) of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 of the Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the mandatory injunction and the consequence of its recovery. In order to declare relief with the plaintiff, the plaintiff had set a fixed fee of Rs 200 for the court fee and jurisdiction, the trial court dismissed the merit, but directed the plaintiff to within 15, the time limit. Pay a fee of Rs. 000 as it should directly occupy the suit land, the value of which is Rs. 15,50,000, while for the purposes of jurisdiction, the value of the suit will be shown as Rs. 200 / - as High Duty Sheet. On appeal, the appeal against such an order was presented to the High Court after it was presented to the judge, who rejected it, according to which the time limit is being sought. , The cost of the property was Rs. 15,50,000 which should have been the value of the case for jurisdiction purposes. The trial court should have directed the plaintiff to amend the plaintiff or amend the order itself, but some Even the plaintiff was not appropriate in the appeal on the basis of technicality not merely to appear before the proper court under which the auxiliary court in the trial That, for which he should not suffer, was such a reasonable matter. The Supreme Court accepted the appeal for the delay, put aside the case and remanded the High Court with a fixed time fee of Rs. 15,000 for the plaintiff's salary. Failure to appeal will be dismissed. inheritance advocates near Mansehra lawyer