Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN versus JAN MUHAMMAD

Sections 135 and 164 of the joint holding portion contain 5 petitions for the total joint holding of the parties, but the respondents applied for the division of the two plots, excluding the remaining three plots, the Tehsildar / Assistant Collector. Was held jointly on Under the former Part Order, the applicants filed a review petition with the Tehsildar for the review of the previous cross-order and prayed that the entire joint holding of the five accounts be put together, and that under the Act the shareholders were divided. , Who had already passed the pre-partition order, was transferred and his successor in front of the district collector could not prefer the same applicants, who approved the petitioner's appeal against the district collector's order. Which restored the order passed by the District Collector and was approved by the Tehsildar. Order that was restored was restored. Revision was filed by the Assistant Collector and the applicant against which the order of the Commissioner's action taken by the Tehsildar / Assistant Collector was not just, equitable and equitable and economically volatile and the dispute between the parties only. This can be solved by consolidating joint holdings on all five cases. And the unauthorized orders and the proceedings of the former Partition were finalized by the Tehsildar, divided by fair and equitable distribution among the shareholders, set aside and pending with the Tehsildar for the distribution of damages. The review application was approved by the Board of Revenue application, in accordance with the spirit of the law list of advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer