NAWAB versus THE STATE
Section 8 Case Remand Scope Review Subordinate Revenue Forums did not have the authority to seek remand because the Executive District Officer (Revenue) was able to remand the matter to a lower court forum under the Thala Development Authority Act 1949 as the dispute was resolved. had gone. The Land Development Authority Act, 1949, nor the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, would prevail, which was the basic law order of the Executive District Officer (Revenue), which was legally deficient, rightly the Member (Colonies) Board. The matter was rejected by the Department of Revenue. In the absence of any error in the order passed by the Board of Revenue of the Merit, the Executive District Officer (Revenue) was rightfully remanded for fresh decision on the merit within the stipulated period, review request dismissed. Was ineligible and the order was retained / restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Chunian lawyer
