MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM
The Section 164 review petition challenged the order of transfer of the case approved by the Executive District Officer (Revenue) that the petitioners were not heard, neither was the applicant present when the invalid order was approved. His lawyer was present and the transfer request is pending before the senior member. The Executive District Officer Petitioner further alleged that the Board of Revenue issued an improper order that the case was decided on a technical basis, which was against the judgment of the Supreme Court, the petitioner prayed. The defective order should be set aside and the case remanded. Responding to the decision of the respondent, the petitioner's request was granted, the petitioner's request was granted, the anonymous order was set aside for the Executive District Officer (Revenue) to make a fresh decision after hearing the two sides. And after hearing the two sides, the case was quickly remanded for a new verdict on merit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Mubarik Pur lawyer