Find a Lawyer

MST. SARDAR BEGUM versus SYED ASHIQ HUSSAIN SHAH

Section 12 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) dealt with the plaintiff's complaint was the specific performance of the contract to sell the defendant to the trial court, despite the receipt of full consideration. The agreement was delayed but the appeals court allowed the appeal which was upheld by the High Court in the second appeal. It was disclosed that the tenant was in actual possession of the land in dispute through the agreement, which the defendant in question had raised a thumbs up to and his son admitted to receiving the money but claimed that it was a On the back of the agreement to accept the receipt of the loan, the defendant's High Court son had in fact concluded that it was established that the defendant had executed the contract and that The son had obtained the balance of the sale price. The High Court also concluded that these results were recorded by the appellate court. Aatun's been refused leave to appeal by the High Court ined to intervene in support of the evidence presented by advocates from Charsada lawyer