THE STATE versus SHAH NAWAZ ALIAS SHAHAN
Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) argued that there was ample evidence of prosecution on record to prove the charges against the accused. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the delay in filing an FIR was not fatal in the prosecution's case. This change at the time of the death of both bodies did not raise any suspicion in the matter. Despite the lengthy scrutiny of the prosecution's witnesses, including the complainant, the intrinsic value of the prosecution's evidence was intact. That the trial court, after defining the evidence in accordance with the law, had convicted the accused for hard reasons and that the unclean decision of acquittal of the high court accused was contrary to the law of the Supreme Court, The appeal was granted to the state, to investigate whether the accused was rightfully acquitted by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Gojra lawyer