Find a Lawyer

SYED AQLEEM ABBASI JAFARI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Recovery of the amount deducted and embezzlement in the rank of criminal and departmental proceedings, after issuing and responding to the notice due to the employee, failing to take effect. I was sentenced to reduction and the recovery of money embezzled by the authorities, and it was submitted by a civil servant that criminal action was also taken against him and no formal inquiry was made. The Validity Service Tribunal rightly observed that there was substantial documentary evidence on record. Withdrew from a regular inquiry was a public servant accounts clerk who collected large sums of money from a bank and placed it in the chest in violation of the security rules. A public servant had the opportunity to defend himself before the inquiry committee, but he was subpoenaed and accompanied. Criminal proceedings can also be taken. Huge money could not be charged by the police against the other government employee, simultaneously and independently against the criminal officer of eac. The department officials had already dealt with the civil servant, the decision passed by the service tribunal was not subject to any legal weakness, so that no significant question of Supreme Court intervention was raised. Involved in the law of public importance under consideration of Article 212 (3) of the Constitution, leave to appeal was denied. jobs for advocates from Lakki Marwat lawyer