Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus STATE

Section 2?2 (b) and 34 34 Although the evidence was appreciated after dark, the availability of electric light at the relevant time proved that the FIR was lodged with a proper miracle and the accused Specifically, he was designated as the original culprit. The alleged murder was a populated area, and it was unreliable that after shooting the victim, the suspects could be seen by someone close to the unidentified, unknown suspect, the complainant and the prosecutor, who was nearby. Were related and the suspect could not be identified. To show anything that the complainant and the prosecution witnesses had reason to falsely implicate him in the murder of the accused, both witnesses made a permanent statement about the incident and in this connection There were no serious and material contradictions in the statements of The E-Police, instead of making the first statement by the Road Foundation and the complainant befor record anything to suggest that the statements of witnesses in connection with the main events were not serious enough to warrant the statements. I was not aware that the witnesses had any enmity or enmity with the accused so that they could be falsely accused of capitalism. This important incident affected confidence and there was no reason to show that there was no reason to not rely solely on the motive established by the prosecution, during the investigation of the case, the recovery of the pistol from the suspect's possession. The accused was legally unlawful because no crime was committed. Recover the pistol from the scene of the incident registration advocate from Chakwal lawyer