Find a Lawyer

MEHREEN ZAIDI versus UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, LAHORE THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR

Rgln 5 (3) (iv) (v) (xii a, i, j, k) Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), 5 3 Change of Intra Court Appeal / Reform Appellant's Complaint in Marksheet The complaint was that the marks In Viva voce, he was replaced by an external inspector for violating the code of conduct, as well as illegal declarations and personal prejudice, and authorities prevented the relevant external examiner from conducting exams. (5) (xii)) (c) University of Health Sciences Lahore, the rules and regulations were that even after alteration / correction, the original numbers should be clear so as to be reasonable, Azh be offered and the image that was used by the examiners before the policy / rule. The makers of the University deserved to be commended for formulating such rules, but at the same time the Office of the Controller of Examinations as well as the examiners were to perform their duties in a fair, honest, fair and equitable manner. I failed. The Regulations High Court has observed in the Compliance / Implementation Compliance Observation that if such a dangerous trend is not timely and effectively investigated for non-compliance with the rules to ensure a fair and transparent system of testing. If not, there will be no end to the allegations / complaints. Complaints in the context of misunderstanding, rightism, personal prejudice, etc., and the confidence / trust that has been created by students in the exam system, especially in the examination system, are also terribly disadvantaged in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. In its true context, the Court will have to deal with the natural weaknesses and intra tax advocates from Fort Abbas lawyer