MEHR MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, A.C.E., MULTAN
Articles 420 and 109 Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 249A Punjab Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985, R6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application The retention of the FIR petitioner / accused through a constitutional application was not included in the preliminary inquiry against him and he was found guilty and had difficulty in appearing in the trial court to defend himself. Did not and the case was proceeding. Because of his irresponsible conduct, the fugitive will lose the rights of his audience even otherwise in this case the challan was presented in a court of competent jurisdiction and the applicant will have to file his complaint under section 249A. Alternatively, the CRPPC demanded that the first trial court approach which had all the evidence submitted by the prosecution be examined in order to appreciate the grounds laid down in the constitutional petition. Even otherwise it was arbitrary to issue a writ under Article 199 of the Constitution and the court should consider the matter first. Will be tmyn, the application is available treatments payers alternative, the petition filed by him, was not manageable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Jhand lawyer