ZAFAR ULLAH versus STATE
No evidence was recorded by the trial court of the section 497 (2) Adultery (Enforcement Hoodo) Ordinance (VII of 1979), section 16 bail, and grant of further investigation, yet by the trial court It was not determined. Further investigations into the alleged kidnapper claimed to be the wife of the accused, in which case the accused will be left behind bars with no useful purpose. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Rahwali lawyer