A. XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 84 suit for recovering money based on two checks, comparing the signature of checks, requesting the plaintiff to appear and defend the case. Was given, entered a written statement. It specifically refused to issue a check in favor of the plaintiff and claimed that both said the check had been removed or stolen from the defendant, the applicant requested that the alleged checks be signed. Compare with a handwriting expert, but the trial court's expert evidence of relinquishment was very helpful in such cases, although the concluding opinion of the handwriting expert was not one of the methods used by law evidence. It was conceded that the 1984 trial court rejected the defendant's request to sign a comparison check. Not legally justified by the ND Decree Trial Court and obtain the remand of the trial trial court by obtaining the signatures of the defendant's samples and comparing the disputed checks with the plaintiff's contentious signatures and Decide on this matter with a handwriting expert.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
