ALLAH DITTA versus STATE
Section 514 Constitutional Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 324/452/427/337 L (ii) / 148/149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition for the Recovery of the Applicant's Property and Bail The order issuing the warrant challenged the full amount of a fine of Rs 50,000, though the accused for whom the applicant was guaranteed was declared innocent during the investigation and challaned in column no.2. However, he was obliged to appear in court on every date of his arrest hearing. However, after being declared innocent by the police, due to a misunderstanding, failing to appear in court to comply with his bail application, the balance was deemed to be inappropriate softness and unreasonable intensity. In the middle of nowhere. The petitioner as well as the facts of the case demanded no interference with the injunctive orders and was retained and the constitutional petition was rejected. However, in view of the specific circumstances of this case, the amount of fines in the interest of justice 50 , Has been reduced from Rs. 000 to Rs. 25000
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Shankiari lawyer