Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAD KHADIM versus CITIBANK, N.A. THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER

Sections 9, 10, 15 and 22 for the collection of loans leave for the appellant to appear and defend, primarily aggravated by the bank's proceedings under Section 15 of the Financial Institutions (Finance Recovery) Ordinance 2001; The property was put on sale, which led to the lawsuit. Seeking for a declaration and in this case the bank filed a leave application which was allowed and the initial issue in connection with the case was prepared by the Banking Court, primarily dismissing the appellant's case. Was filed, mainly because the appellant had earlier filed a similar case. In the present case, what relief was not claimed in the said statement, though it was available to them at the same time and the second case was stopped under the provisions of O II, R 2, CPC Appellant filed the present Appeal Bank. It was also filed by him. Appeal against the Appellant for recovery of its dues and the Bank will not seek the provisions of Section 15 (Finance Recovery) of the financial institutions Ordinance, 2001 In the case of the Appellant, the Court withdraws the matter. The permission was sought, it was stated that the return was allowed and the case filed by the appellant was withdrawn accordingly. family advocate from Dijkot lawyer