MST. RASHIDAN BIBI THROUGH L.RS. versus MST. JANNATAY
A. XLVII, R 1 On the basis of the applicants' competence performance, the decision was requested to review that the documents submitted after the High Court decision were recovered when the applicant was sufficient on record to show the documents. Failed to fetch the content, was not available at this time when it filed a counter-claim against the respondents, in which case, the documents could not be accepted at such stages, Conveniently not entitled to review revision of new and important case or discovery of evidence. . Khushi said that no intermittent phase of the documents could be considered in the document. The law of fate should be strictly banned when a new and important case or evidence is discovered, even by the concerned party. Which was basically a question of fact.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Hazro lawyer
