STATE versus MESSRS HAJI SHEIKH FAIZ MUHAMMAD DIN MUHAMMAD, IMPORTERS ANDEXPORTERS THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER AND 4
Maintaining mutual open and current accounts for collection of funds through the Custodian of enemy-owned demarcation parties through Section 22 and 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 85 and Section 19 Banker and Customer Suite Bank The suit was run under Article 85 of the Limitation Act. 1908 and the period of delimitation was three years beginning from the end of the year in which the last item was inserted or proved in the statement of accounts, in the present case, it appears that the last transaction between the parties. There was 494 1965 and, thus, the scope of this case began on 1 1966, therefore, the case filed in 26 6 1974 was clearly time-barred, which was suspected to be processed. Could not create a confession to extend the time limit. Its term had already expired in 1969, with section 19, the Limitation Act, 1908 affirming the validity of the limitation of validation, which must have preceded e. Expired duration expression for the suit
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Charsada lawyer