Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus REHMAT ALI

O XLI, R 27 Additional evidence; Delay in filing application for additional proof of principle public record was dismissed by the Appellant on the basis that the same case was filed at a later stage. , There is no reason to delay allowing additional evidence to be directed by either party. Various provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, empowering the court to allow additional evidence at any stage would be lost, in almost every case praying for additional evidence, usually at a later stage and sometimes in cases. Were held at the end of the hearing, even during the Supreme Court's decision on the level and such, the courts always ignored the process and considered the question of whether the applicants had a fair decision on the matter. It was also necessary for, by request, to keep only certified copies of public documents records Or who were second. Admissible permission to present additional evidence does not mean that the originality of the document was recognized in favor of the party in the matter or its clear value for the issue that the document was approved by the Appellate Court. The order placed was set aside and applicants were allowed to submit proof of payment of the cost according to which the revision was allowed divorce advocates from Khair Pur lawyer