Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus JUDGE BANKING COURT-I, GUJRANWALA DIVISION GUJRANWALA

The executrix / bank has initiated the execution of the proceedings and gives the verdict for implementing the provisions of Articles 15, 19 and 22 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), sections 551 and AXXI, R 37. Plaintiff's property was auctioned off by a not-yet-sold banking court that issued a notice of judgment under OXI, R-37, CPC, which succeeded after the arrest warrant for the judgment, Judge's plea filed for withdrawal of arrest warrant, but the aforesaid application was dismissed by the banking court. In doing so, the default law was completely disregarded and proceedings for the issuance of arrest warrants, without adhering to the provisions of Section 51, Provo, CPC, and completely ignoring the law on the subject. Was Judgment of the judgment Banking court, without satisfying the conditions laid down in Section 11, CPC, could not issue a mechanical order for the custody of the judgment in the Prison High Court; To the extent of the order of the Banking Court and it has been observed that if the application of the bank under section 15, for the arrest and detention of the judgment debtor, the CPC is pending or filed in the future, the banking court In accordance with the law and in accordance with its merits, Section 11 shall decide on the delivery of the CPC. famous lower court advocate from Samma Satta lawyer