SULEMAN AND 2 OTHERS versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, SUMUNDARI
Section 21 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1993 Higher Powers Rights Jurisdiction Jurisdiction of the Board, dispute resolution question and decision taken by the Collector. When the trial court was reinstated by the Board of Revenue and the verdict was given in favor of pre-emptors, the constitutional application filed by the shopkeepers against the order of revenue by the board was dismissed by the High Court. Had lost their control, therefore, the right could not be granted in their favor. The fact is that before the trial court and the appellate court disputed the question of the whereabouts of the emperors, there would be no reasonable basis for questioning its legal status. An order passed by the Board of Revenue in the exercise of this amended jurisdiction over the reversal of a pre-emption suit in the Appeal by the Board of Revenue on a mixed question of law, the final court on the Revenue Side In exercise of its power, Article 199 of the Constitution shall not be held before the High Court in its extraordinary jurisdiction under which the judgment and decree have been passed, highlighting any jurisdictional error and legal defect in the judgment. Failed. The appellate court overturned and the order passed by the trial court was restored, the question of fact set at the level of the Board of Revenue was not open to challenge in the constitutional petition and the High Court decision vacated by the Supreme Court. Did not demand intervention by. Appeal denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
