Find a Lawyer

MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, ARIFWALA versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

Article 8 (185 ()) was the highest bidder applicable to the contract, the principle of termination and the cancellation contract for the holding of the cattle fair, and according to the contract the respondent, within the same day, security Had to submit. Seven days the municipal committee canceled the auction on the ground that the defendant did not submit the security within three days as required by the rules and the unclaimed amount was seized. The High Court allowed the constitutional petition filed by the defendant and Instructed the municipal committee to return the money. The authenticity of the money from the municipality was bound by its terms as a party to the agreement. There was also an agreement given to the respondent. The long way to claim a successful bid was then ready to deposit the balance and also went to the municipal committee office for security deposit but was not allowed to make a successful bid through the municipal committee. And ignored the procedure adopted by the Supreme Court to avoid award. Contracted with another person who regularly observed without any rules, the whole exercise was tarnished with inadequate, the High Court justified in passing the order which was not fixed on any technical basis. The appeal could have been dismissed famous supreme court advocate from Pindi gheb lawyer