Section 265 K & 202 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 148 and 149 QTL AMD, riot with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly private complaint, return of scope complainant filed FIR against the accused and accomplices. Of A private complaint was lodged against the accused and co-accused in the murder of his son's complainant. The trial court acquitted all the accused of the private complaint, while the accused was arrested after the arrest of the accused. Was granted, then prosecuted by the trial court, where the complainant and witnesses of the incident made statements on oath that the accused was involved in the crime because of misunderstandings and suspicions. In the background of this, the petition filed before the trial court under Section 265K, the CCP wishes for its victory, however, the court found that But he denied that after applying the procedure under section 202, CRPC, the private complaint was turned into a state case, which could not be legally withdrawn by the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses Testified that the defendant was involved in the case due to a misunderstanding and after such evidence it was suspected to be involved in the crime, which was important on the prosecution's establishment, before the trial court with the accused There was no option but to evade, as there was no possibility of punishment in this case when the ocular account itself did not support his case. Any person rrha was, and miscellaneous pieces of evidence could be punished in this case. Not convicted of any crime The trial court has ruled out the illegality of refusing the accused's plea.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
