DHL PAKISTAN PVT. LTD. versus MUHAMMAD IMTIAZ SIDDIQUI
Sections 27, 31 and 30 of the complaint against the separate courier company were accepted by the Court of Consumers and a pre-order was issued against the defendant after which the order was issued to pay the complainant, And then hearing the defendant's legality request was pending for more than two years and numerous notices and guaranteed warrants were issued to seek the presence of the courier company that the consumer was going to enforce the court order The claimant for the post has gone from pillar to post and the appellant is holding a court of notable and notable consumers. There I lived. Was the special tribunals that were created under the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005, which was a special dispensation, applicable to the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code 1908 and instead of an injunction, the consumer court prepared a cost memorandum in which There was nothing illegal. Unexpected order appeal was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
