Find a Lawyer

WAPDA/LESCO THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus MIAN HAQ NAWAZ

Schedule Ex-petitioner applied for electrical connection and demanded to meet the installation costs and demand notice was issued which provided the applicant to increase the liability on the basis of internal audit report. Was assessed, among which was the case. Authority and Audit Department, was not valid under the rules No authority of the authority reserves that the amount demanded by the notice may be raised unilaterally or unilaterally by the excuse of the increase in the value of the material authority. Increased amount will not be entitled to recover. The value of the content provided to the consumers was increased. The Audit Report cannot make users responsible for any money and cannot make any agreement between the authority and the consumer.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• MUHAMMAD FEROZE v. SESSIONS JUDGE, BHAKKAR 2013 YLR 1530
• DHL PAKISTAN PVT. LTD. v. MUHAMMAD IMTIAZ SIDDIQUI 2013 MLD 1530
• SALEEM AKHTAR v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2013 MLD 1535
• CARETEX v. COLLECTOR SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE 2013 PTD 1536
• ABDUL GHAFFAR v. Syed SHABBIR SHAH GILLANI 2013 PCrLJ 1544
• CREATIIVE ELECTRONICS AND AUTOMATION v. COMMISSIONER, LAHORE 2013 CLC 1547
• GHULAM RASOOL v. AHMED KHAN 2013 MLD 1547
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN v. ALLAH WASAYA TEXTILE AND FINISHING MILLS LTD. 2013 PTD 1548

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Rawat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes