ALTAF HUSSAIN versus RETURNING OFFICER NA-135 AND 171 (SANGLA HILL)
Sections 14 (5) and 14 (5A) Definition of Election Appeal Proofs Disapproval of Nomination Disclosure False Declaration Income Tax Disclosure Candidate nomination papers for the provincial assembly seat were approved by the Appellant. The winner was that the candidate was running a compressed natural gas (CNG) filling station which was shown at Rs 250,000, which was apparently a false declaration, and the (actual) worth of the filling station was Rs 50 million. Was more. Last month, the filling station had a monthly gas consumption bill of Rs 24,18,640, indicating that sales against such consumption amounted to Rs 30 lakh. After deducting all taxes, the candidate was earning at least Rs 2 lakh every month, while showing his monthly income of Rs 21,000 while the candidate showed his monthly income of Rs 21,000 while his bank. The account showed a credit balance of Rs 140, 52,486, which was sufficient to prove the fact that he had not disclosed his real assets and that his declaration was based on false information, which was on the occasion of the oath. Was presented on, no one could save Rs 140,52,486 as compared to monthly income of Rs 21,000, the candidate was earning a viable income. But he could not show the same in his income to avoid income tax and was unable to explain the fact that if the monthly gas consumption at the filling station is more than Rs. 24,000, how to sell compressed natural gas? Will be? (CNG) will not exceed Rs. 43,00,000, and consequently his monthly earnings will not be (at least) 2 lakhs. In the circumstances, he deliberately made a false declaration on oath.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
