MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY/PRINCIPAL OFFICER versus SHAFI\'S PAK ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Sections 9 and 22 filed suit for debt recovery, alleging that the court erroneously dismissed the defendant's chairman taking notice of defendant's position against the banking tribunal: Documents that were processed / signed by, have been recorded. This was the second defendant who was financially advantageous and the first defendant had nothing to do with the transaction. The court held that no liability could be created. That was the way the verdict was issued. The fact that no exemption was possible, under the circumstances, the High Court, without further comment, observed that the bank-filed appeal was vacant. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
