Find a Lawyer

SARDAR KHAN NIAZI versus BAREX LAHORE LTD.

5 290 and 265 application under Companies 290, Companies Ordinance, 1984 It has been alleged that the affairs of the company are being pursued illegally, in a fraudulent manner and in the persecution of the members and for the public interest. And that the current administration is not responsible for it. Maintaining members' registers, share transfer registers, minutebooks, etc., and thus acting fraudulently, the respondents claimed that the purpose of this petition was to harass only and to deal with matters already settled with the old administration. Reopening, which was denied based on the allegations and counter-allegations in connection with a limited company, can be concluded that the Companies Ordinance, since section 265 (ii) of 1984, is a company Investigation of the cases was necessary in the public interest. In an effective remedy, under the circumstances, the High Court directs the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan to appoint inspectors for the purposes of investigating company affairs in light of allegations that the inspector attached representatives of both parties for investigative purposes. Will present and submit: Current decision by using the channel as a report to the High Court within a period of 3 months from date \ r \ n \ r \ n power of attorney advocate Manoabad lawyer