STATE versus SPECIAL JUDGE CENTRAL
Section 5 (2) Amendment of Pakistan Criminal Law (XL of 1958), Section 10 (4) Criminal Code of Conduct (VI of 1898), Sections 494 and 439 were raided on the accused, which was raided on the spot. And the challan was investigated against the accused who recovered Rs 10,000 from the cash which was presented to the court. And the approval of the sanction was commenced by a proper public trial and the complainant was examined in this case when the public prosecutor submitted a copy of the order sanctioned by the Ministry of Interior for the withdrawal of approval. Trial court dismisses plea dismissal Three years after the Interior Ministry cited reasons for unlawful withdrawal of approval, the trial court proceeded to record the prosecution's evidence Then withdrew this approval because of the alleged federal government offense This was based on the offense. The accused was not only against the complainant but also against the society and to enter evidence in the case, and then to reach a conclusion, the trial court's case was whether it was false or the trial court was required to do so in accordance with the actual trial law. Instruct
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from FR Bannu lawyer