Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus STATE

Further investigation against the accused in Section 497 (2) Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22, alleges that he complained to the complainant about 3/4 years ago on the pretext of sending his brother to London for work. Money was received ; The accused had allegedly taken the complainant's brother to South Africa and, having left him, had returned to Pakistan and on the same route the complainant had been seduced by the accused and the complainant's brother had not returned to Pakistan from South Africa where He traveled with the accused, neither during the interrogation did the travel document be obtained from the accused, nor did any evidence show that the accused had traveled to South Africa with the complainant's brother as the FIR I am accused, it was brought on record why the complainant's brother did not come to Pakistan and did he find Taxes was found. Any foreign country, was a question that should be answered by the prosecution during the trial. In addition to the story set forth in the FIR, there were facts on record as well, enough to bring the initial fax suspect's case under further investigation, which entitles him to bail. In the circumstances, the bail is admitted registration advocate from Haripur lawyer