Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL KHAN versus UNITED BANK LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER AND DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY

Sections 9, 19 and 22 were sued for recovery of the debt by the bank and the order was executed, and to the satisfaction of the order, 3 mortgage flats were ordered to be auctioned and the defendants Has filed objections saying that they were unaware of this and bought the flat. They were dismissed for bank objections and the court, without giving any reason, directed them to sell a flat through auction belonging to the appellant appellant, saying that such order was discriminatory. And which will cause prejudice to the rights of the appellant. There was no reason why the appellant's flat could be directed to auction before the court should have instructed the objectors, either their property or all of them. Proportional amounts should be deposited to save the property. The High Court should have accepted the appeal and put it into auction simultaneously and the matter was remanded to the Banking Court in view of the unnecessary order in order to pass a fresh order in relation to the implementation of the decree. \ R \ n \ r \ n famous high court advocate from Talhur lawyer