ALI AHMAD, (SUB-INSPECTOR) versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, MULTAN REGION, MULTAN
Section 154 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 161, 380 and 452 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Anti-Corruption of Punjab, Constitution of Pakistan 1985 (1973), Article 199 Canceling the Constitution Petition The FIRFR filed a case against the applicant / accused and his accomplice to constitute a comprehensible commission because the complainant alleged that some money was paid as bribe. And the rest was to be paid, but no raids were made, under the Anti-Corruption Establishment Ordinance, 1961, formulated under the Anti-Corruption Establishment Ordinance, 1961. The applicant could not be prosecuted without preliminary investigation under the Punjab Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules 1985; the rules of accuracy established under the Anti-Corruption Establishment Ordinance, 1961 were not compulsory and should not be read in contempt of parents. ? Form the law yourself and it was not required by law that a preliminary inquiry should be conducted in each case. Section 154, CRPC, including the FCCCP: The constitutional request had to be made effective because of the illegality, It was removed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Dijkot lawyer