FARMAISH ALI versus STATE
The denial of the pre-arrest bail granted by Section 498 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468, 471 and 506 had proved that the seller's contract was executed in favor of both the applicants by the argument that a The applicant was not the beneficiary, to no avail. Powers, one of the applicants in the circumstance, also tried to involve the son of one of the complainants in a false case of stealing the contentious document to avoid being retrieved during the investigation, both of which were filed by his real sisters. Was deprived of heritage property, was specially named in the FIR and did not indicate any misconduct by her real sisters in favor of receiving extraordinary relief prior to her arrest. Was done, the other applicant was signing a fake document, no power on the bail application It was rejected when it happened
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Tharparkar lawyer
